McDougald v. Rossi
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Hartley F. Peart, U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, Albert H. Elliott, Assistant Inheritance Tax Attorney, and Gus L. Baraty, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
At the close of the argument, Sloss, J., delivered the opinion of the court, Shaw, J., and Lawlor, J., concurring:
By his will the testator left one-half of his “property or possessions ’ ’ to his wife and the other one-half to be dis tributed in equal shares among his sons and daughters. The estate was all community property. The court below charged the widow with inheritance tax on only one-half of the entire community property, and from this order the treasurer appeals.
There is nothing in this will to indicate an intention to make the testamentary gift to the widow stand in lieu of her…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Estate of StanfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- In re the Estate of GilmoreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- In Re Estate of PragerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
3Cited by27 opinions
- Lyeth v. HoeySupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Potter v. ChambersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
- In Re Clark's EstateMontana Supreme Court · 1937
- Texas Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Cohn v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.