Legal Opinion

White v. Deering

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 14, 1918No. Civ. No. 1827PublishedCited by 11 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

Sophia P. Comstock, a resident of the county of Sacramento, died on the thirty-first day of July, 1915, leaving a last will and testament, of which, after due proceedings, defendant, Mabel Peering, was appointed and qualified as executrix. In due time plaintiff presented to said executrix her claim against said estate for “services as nurse, housekeeper and secretary, requiring constant service during the day and night, from December 12, 1913, to and including July 31, 1915, $1,963,” which said claim was by the defendant rejected, and this action was brought to recover thereon. The case was…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Boughton v. . FlintNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Landers v. WhitneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916
  3. In Re the Estate of TompkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. In Re Estate of WillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Sheldon v. . SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Estate of SargavakCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  2. Hunter v. BattiestSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. Richardson v. BeebeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. Estate of SpencerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  5. Estate of LoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API