Bird v. Borough of Moosic
District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA HEATHER BIRD, Plaintiff, CIVIL ACTION NO. 3:18-cv02289 v. (SAPORITO, M.J.) BOROUGH OF MOOSIC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM The case is assigned to us upon the consent of the parties, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 17; Doc. 18.) The matter is now before us on the defendants’ motion to dismiss or to strike the plaintiff's second amended complaint, pursuant to Rules 12(b)(6) and 12(f) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (Doc. 69.) The motion is fully briefed and ripe for…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.