Miller Paper Co. v. State

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: These are cross appeals, on the grounds of inadequacy and excessiveness, from a judgment of the Court of Claims awarding $208,650 for a total taking of land with improvements. The decision fails to disclose the computations employed by the court in arriving at the valuation. However the record contains sufficient evidence to sustain the award. Though there was conflicting evidence as to value, the award is within the range of expert testimony. In these circumstances we should not modify the award. (Matter of Huie [Merrill—City of New…