City of Rochester v. BSF Realty, Ltd.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed, without costs. Memorandum: We do not agree with appellant’s claim that the decision of the trial court is so inadequate that it precludes proper appellate review. None of the defects found in the authorities relied upon by appellant, such as the failure to identify direct and consequential damage (Wineburgh v State of New York, 20 AD2d 961) or the failure to specify the highest and best use of the parcel (Conklin v State of New York, 22 ÁD2d 481), is present here. The trial court properly determined that the highest and best use of the subject was its existing…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Larkin v. . Nassau Electric R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Levin v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
- People v. FreemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Sapia v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
- Argersinger v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- W. T. Grant Co. v. SrogiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Phelps Dodge Industries, Inc. v. KondzielaskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Egleston v. KalamaridesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Glenn Houle Co. v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- In re City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.