Waldron v. Angleman
Supreme Court of New Jersey
On rule to show canse why a retraxit should not he set aside.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the-court was delivered'by •
Hendrickson, J.
^ This is a rule to* show cause why a retraxit, purporting to have been executed by the plaintiff, and later filed with the clerk, should not be set aside as having been improvidently and unjustly obtained. The defendant is one of the attorneys of the court and the lDlaintiff *167a former client of his. The action is for the recovery of $500, collected by the attorney -from the Public Service Corporation in settlement of a suit for damages- growing out of a trolley accident. The affidavits taken under the rule show that of the amount…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Van Billiard's Administrators v. NaceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1855
3Cited by5 opinions
- Turner v. FlemingSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Kuhlman v. WiebenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Scott v. MooreSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Miller v. HowardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Seminara v. GrismanNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1945