Seminara v. Grisman
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
I am informed that alcoholic intoxication may in intensity extend from a state of conscious exhilaration to a condition of insensible torpidity. Adopting that postulate, I proceed to determine whether in the factual circumstances of this cause the alleged intoxication of the defendant, if any, on the particular occasion had advanced to such a degree as to now enable her to avoid her contractual obligation.
On the 28th day of March, 1945, the defendant, a widow apparently of middle age, acquired by purchase a residential property in the Borough of Jamesburg, in the County of Middlesex, at the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Garrett v. GarrettNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916
- Waldron v. AnglemanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1904
- Crane v. ConklinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1831
- Hutchinson v. TindallNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1835
- Rodman v. ZilleyNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1831
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Hakimoglu v. Trump Taj Mahal AssociatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1994