Atlantic City v. Gardner
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
Complainant, the city of Atlantic City, is the owner of a tax sale certificate purchased by it at a sale under the statute. It has filed a bill to foreclose the right of redemption against those entitled thereto under the statute.
Defendant, a mortgagee, has filed an answer and counter-claim, both of which complainant moves to strike.
In so far as the answer is concerned, it admits the tax lien and asks that the amount thereof be fixed by proof. This the answering defendant has a right to require. The answer will not be struck but complainant must proceed before a master, on notice to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mitsch v. OwensNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
- Kurzius v. the Hillside Land Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Burgin v. RutherfordNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1897
3Cited by8 opinions
- Chelsea Laundry Co. v. ToscanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Barry, Inc. v. Baf, LimitedNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Bron v. WeintraubNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1963
- Bloomfield Heights, Inc. v. Holland Associates, Inc.New Jersey Circuit Court · 1944
- Davis v. Division of Tax AppealsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1947
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.