Legal Opinion

Bron v. Weintraub

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided May 6, 1963PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

79 N.J. Super. 106 (1963)

190 A.2d 680

THEODORUS BRON, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS,

v.

HARRY WEINTRAUB, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS. HUDSON TRADING CORPORATION, ET AL., PLAINTIFFS-RESPONDENTS,

v.

EMILE W. SAULNIER, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued April 1, 1963.

Decided May 6, 1963.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FREUND and FOLEY.

Mr. Ernest F. Keer, Jr. argued the cause for appellants (Messrs. Boyd, Dodd, Keer & Booth, attorneys).

Mrs. Sylvia B. Pressler argued the cause for respondents.

The opinion of the court was delivered by FREUND, J.A.D.

Appellants…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chelsea Laundry Co. v. ToscanoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Mitsch v. OwensNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1913
  3. Atlantic City v. GardnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
  4. Nordell v. Mantua Twp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1957
  5. McKelway v. ArmourNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1854

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Manning v. KASDINS.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1967
  2. Northfield City v. ZellNew Jersey Tax Court · 1991
  3. PHOENIX PINELANDS CORPORATION, ETC. VS. HARRY DAVIDOFF (C-000246-11, OCEAN COUNTY AND STATEWIDE)New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API