Davis v. Division of Tax Appeals
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Perskie, J.
This is a tax case. It presents the usual question. Did prosecutor establish by persuasive evidence that his land and premises were erroneously assessed for the tax year of 1945? Our answer is in the negative.
Prosecutor is the owner of the premises designated and laiown as Lot 62-1, Block 1891, 524-526 Orange Street, Newark, New Jersey. It is located on a business street. It begins at a point 27.50 feet west of Myrtle Avenue. Thé plot has a frontage of 48.83 feet on Orange Street, the easterly 30 feet thereof is 100 feet in depth. The…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- New Jersey Bell Telephone Co. v. City of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
- Kurzius v. the Hillside Land Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Atlantic City v. GardnerNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1938
3Cited by1 opinion
- Tp. of North Bergen v. Div. of Tax AppealsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1956