Legal Opinion

Deming Inv. Co. v. Bruner Oil Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 3, 1913No. 2057PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by the Deming Investment Company against the Bruner Oil Company and the Payne Oil Company. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHayes, J.

Plaintiff in error brought this action in the court below to quiet its title to 40 acres of land situated in Tulsa county. The cause was tried to that court upon an agreed statement of facts, the substance of which we here state: Martha Hohlahta, who was a full-blood citizen of the Creek Nation, died in May, 1899,'at the age of two years. She left no surviving brothers or sisters or descendants of such, and left as her only heirs at law her father and mother, Cheparn and Lucy Hohlahta, who were also full-blood citizens of the Creek Nation. On the 6th day of April,. 1904, said Martha Hohlahta…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mullen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  2. Sanders v. SandersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  3. Barnes v. StonebrakerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
  4. Partridge v. DykinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Moffett v. ConleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Oates v. FreemanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
  3. Bilby v. GillilandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Smith v. Sumpsey and RosieSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  5. Parks v. LoveSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API