Legal Opinion

Partridge v. Dykins

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 10, 1911No. 711PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Oklahoma County Court; Sam Hooker, Judge. Action by W. R. Dylans and another against John A. Partridge. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

TURNER J.

On December 28, 1907, W. R. Dykins and Della Dykins, defendants in error, as plaintiffs, sued John A.. Partridge, plaintiff in error, before a justice of the peace in Oklahoma county. Their second amended bill of particulars substantially states that plaintiff is justly indebted to them $150, balance due for the rent of their farm for 1907, by virtue of the terms of a lease contract therewith filed as an exhibit; that while hold ing under said lease for the year 1907 defendant made a crop (describing it) and, after alleging statutory grounds! therefor, asked that the same be attached…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Rubens v. HillIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Lewis & Co. v. ChisholmSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  3. Cook v. . SouleNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Clenighan v. McFarlandNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1890
  5. West v. EmmonsNew York Supreme Court · 1809

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Noble v. TweedyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Dice's Administrator v. Zweigart's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  3. Ross v. HanerTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  4. Middagh v. Stanal Sound Ltd.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Deming Inv. Co. v. Bruner Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API