Legal Opinion

Cobb v. State Canvassing Board

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 2006No. 29,095PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SERNA, Justice.

{1} Petitioners, two candidates in the 2004 presidential election, applied to the State Canvassing Board for a recount and recheck of certain ballots and deposited $114,400 for both procedures as required by NMSA 1978, Section 1-14-15(A), (B) (2001) (amended 2005). The State Canvassing Board conditioned beginning the recount and recheck procedures on Petitioners first depositing $1.4 million, the entire estimated cost, in advance. A lawsuit ensued challenging whether the State Canvassing Board had such authority. While this case was on appeal, the Legislature amended…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Bush v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. State v. RowellNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Sego v. KirkpatrickNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Regents of the University of New Mexico v. New Mexico Federation of TeachersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Clark v. JohnsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Rivera v. American General Financial Services, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2011
  2. American Civil Liberties Union v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Maestas Ex Rel. Estate of Varela v. ZagerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Republican Party v. New Mexico Taxation & Revenue DepartmentNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. JADE G.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2007

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API