Dragicevic v. State Industrial Accident Commission
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
At the time of his death by an industrial accident on October 1, 1917, Dan Dragich, deceased, and his employer were both operating under the Workmen’s Compensation Act. The only claim*570ant uncler that law in this instance is the father of deceased, who at all times has been and is now a resident of Austria-Hungary, now Jugo-Slavia. No claim of any kind was filed with the Industrial Accident Commission until March 27, 1922, when the brother of the decedent, professing to act as administrator of his estate, filed a claim in the usual form. No-action was taken on this claim, but on November 14,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Butterfield v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1924
3Cited by12 opinions
- Burke v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
- Rosell v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1940
- Vukovich v. St. Louis, Rocky Mountain Pacific Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1936
- Martini, Et Ux. v. Coal Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1928
- Liimatainen v. State Industrial Accident CommissionOregon Supreme Court · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.