Legal Opinion

Duncan v. Weidman

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1943No. 31688PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPaine, J.

This is an appeal in a workmen’s compensation case from a trial de novo in the district court, in which an award of compensation had been set aside and the petition dismissed.

The deceased, Orville Duncan, was employed as a battery man by the defendant, and plaintiff claims that he came to *865his death while on duty and in the course of'his employment at the defendant’s place of business. His widow, as plaintiff and appellant, brings her appeal to this court. Defendant denies that the deceased had had any accident or injury while on the job.

Plaintiff testified that they lived at 2028 Q street;…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mullen v. City of HastingsNebraska Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Shamp v. Landy Clark Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Rose v. City of FairmontNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Feeney v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Kaffenberger v. IversonNebraska Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Aiken v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Pixa v. Grainger Bros.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Kanoff v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API