Legal Opinion
In Re Akram
United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California
Decided March 6, 2001No. LA 00-42035-KMPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION RE ORDERS GRANTING LAM MOTIONS IN PART AND DENYING LAM MOTIONS IN PART
KATHLEEN P. MARCH, Bankruptcy Judge.
I. Issue Presented
In a “Chapter 20” situation (chapter 7 case followed by a chapter 13 case), 1 where debtors receive a chapter 7 discharge, and then file a chapter 13 case, and successfully move to have the completely “underwater” 2 junior secured creditors lien-stripped pursuant to Lam 3 such that the Court grants the Lam motion to the extent of valuing that creditor’s secured claim as zero for chapter 13 plan purposes, should the creditor’s general unsecured claim under the…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Dewsnup v. TimmSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Johnson v. Home State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Nobelman v. American Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Farrey v. SanderfootSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Long v. BullardSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- In Re OkosisiUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nevada · 2011
- In Re JarvisUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. Illinois · 2008
- In Re HillUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2010
- In Re FrazierUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Grandstaff v. Casey (In Re Casey)United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California · 2010
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.