Legal Opinion
Bertani v. Beck
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided June 15, 1984No. 299PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WIEAND, Judge:
The decision in this case rests upon the interpretation to be placed upon paragraph 6 of an oil and gas lease covering 13,604 acres of land in Clinton and Centre Counties. The lease, negotiated by C.E. Beck, agent for Amoco Production Company (Amoco), and executed on October 26, 1977, required Amoco to pay an initial consideration therefor of $13,604. In addition, Amoco was to pay royalties consisting of one-eighth (⅛) of the net proceeds derived from extract ing and marketing certain enumerated minerals. Although the term of the lease was stated to be ten years, paragraph 6…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
- Schacter v. AlbertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
- Day v. Volkswagenwerk AktiengesellschaftSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Weiss v. Keystone MacK Sales, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- Pines Plaza Bowling, Inc. v. Rossview, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- McCausland v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Jacobs v. CNG Transmission Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- Hite v. Falcon PartnersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Smithbower v. Southwest Central Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Smithbower v. SW CENT. RURAL ELEC. COOPERATIVE, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.