Ford v. Coweta Hardware Co.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from County Court, Wagoner County; ■ W. T. Hunt, Judge. Replevin by the Coweta Hardware Company, a corporation, against Dan Ford and others. • Judgment for plaintiff, and defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtKane, C. J.
This controversy arose out of an action in replevin, commenced by the defendant in error, plaintiff below, against Dan Ford and C. W. Ford, plaintiffs i!n error, defendants below. The property involved consisted of one bay horse and one gray mare. Upon trial to a jury there was verdict for the plaintiff, upon which judgment was duly entered, to reverse which this proceeding in error was commenced. Hereafter the parties will be called “plaintiff” and “defendants,” respectively, as they appeared in the court below.
Whether the action of the court below was. right depends on whether a certain…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Brown v. DunckelMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
- Ackerman v. C. C. Chapell Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ambrister v. DaltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Nicholson v. BynumSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Stokes v. KirkSupreme Court of Colorado · 1938