Brown v. Dunckel
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Ingham. Replevin. Defendant brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.
This case began in justice’s court where Dunckel replevied from Brown a horse which he claimed as owner. Brown defended in the right of Roehm & Davison for whom he was agent. Upon trial on appeal in the circuit court it was shown that one Malone was formerly the owner of the horse; that on April 20, 1879, Malone was indebted to Roehm & Davison, and gave them his promissory note for $200, payable -with interest six months from date; that on November 21, 1879, this note remained unpaid and Malone was also indebted to Roehm & Davison on account; the sum with the amount of the note being in all…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hotchin v. SecorMichigan Supreme Court · 1860
- Burchard v. FrazerMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
- Sage v. WalkerMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by15 opinions
- Savings & Loan Society v. BurnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Haggerty v. MacGregorMichigan Court of Appeals · 1968
- Wilson v. PickeringMontana Supreme Court · 1903
- People Ex Rel. P. Koenig Coal Co. v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Willows v. RosenstienIdaho Supreme Court · 1897
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.