Longo v. Tauriello
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDi Gtoyanna, J.
Defendant moves, pursuant to rules 106 and 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice, to dismiss the complaint upon the ground that the same is insufficient in law and that the court has not jurisdiction of the subject matter of the action, pursuant to rule 103 of the Rules of Civil Practice to strike out part of paragraph fifth of the complaint on the ground that the same is sham, frivolous and irrelevant, and, pursuant to rule 112 of the Rules of Civil Practice, for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiffs cross-move to strike out defendant’s answer upon the ground that the same is sham and frivolous…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Andrews v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- People Ex Rel. Bensky v. Warden of the City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Charles W. Blakeslee & Sons v. CarrollSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1894
- Wright v. LothropMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
- Meyer v. ParrOhio Court of Appeals · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Park Knoll Associates v. SchmidtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Loudin v. Mohawk Airlines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1964
- Abrams v. Crompton-Richmond Co.New York Supreme Court · 1957
- Cheatum v. WehleNew York Supreme Court · 1957
- Held v. MerendinoNew York Supreme Court · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.