Abrams v. Crompton-Richmond Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMorris E. Spector, J.
This is a motion by defendants under rule 113 of the Rules of Civil Practice to dismiss the complaint and for summary judgment. Plaintiffs allege that defendant O’Donnell uttered false and defamatory accusations at a meeting “ of all the interested parties ” held before, and by call of, a Referee in bankruptcy, regarding the estate of a debtor in an arrangement proceeding. Defendants assert, as the basis for this motion, an absolute and unqualified privilege, in that the statements “ were made during the course of the judicial proceeding which was then pending before the Referee and that such…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Andrews v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
- Marsh v. . EllsworthNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
- People Ex Rel. Bensky v. Warden of the City PrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- Roberts v. PrattNew York Supreme Court · 1940
- Lipton v. FriedmanNew York Supreme Court · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Weissman v. HassettDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- Friedman v. AlexanderAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Kitchner v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975
- Schwartz v. BartleNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- 55th Management Corp. v. GoldmanNew York Supreme Court · 2003