Legal Opinion

Meyer v. Parr

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1941No. 5960PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By MATTHEWS. PJ.

The trial court sustained a general demurrer to the petition and the plaintiff ■ not desiring to plead further, judgment was rendered for the defendant, dismissing the action at the plaintiff’s costs. This appeal is from that judgment.

The plaintiff alleged in his petition that he was engaged in the business of a funeral director and embalmer, and that the defendant well knowing that fact and maliciously intending to injure him in his reputation and business wrote and filed certain letters and affidavits with the Ohio State Board . of Embalmers containing the false,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Andrews v. . GardinerNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. McKee v. HughesTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. American Beauty Homes Corp. v. Louisville & Jefferson County Planning & Zoning CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1964
  2. Mark K. Patton, M.D., a Single Man v. Lynn Jacob Cox, Wife, and as Independent of the Last Will of Michael D. CoxCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Burns v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1999
  4. Moore v. West Lawn Memorial Park, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1973
  5. Melton v. SlonskyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API