Legal Opinion
Howard v. Mahoney
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided September 24, 1940No. 29640PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBayless, C. J.
O. R. Howard filed an action in the district court of Oklahoma county to enjoin the use by Jennie L. Mahoney of adjoining property in a manner violative of certain zoning ordinances of Oklahoma City. A special demurrer to the second amended petition was sustained, and Howard appeals.
He alleges the ownership of the described adjoining premises by him and defendant, respectively, and that both were located within the district zoned for U-l use. He then pleads certain sections of chapter 25, Oklahoma City General Ordinances, Revision 1936, of which we note the following; Section one (1) defines…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Strain v. MimsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
- Landay v. Board of Zoning AppealsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Baddour v. City of Long BeachNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Matter of Monument Garage Corp. v. LevyNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
- Perrin's App. Bd. of Adjustment's App.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carney v. City of BaltimoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1952
- Lowry v. City of MankatoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
- Pacific Greyhound Lines v. Sun Valley Bus Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1950
- Moore v. PettusSupreme Court of Alabama · 1954
- People v. ScrafanoMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.