Legal Opinion
United States v. Davis
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 25, 2011No. 09-3010PublishedCited by 44 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TYMKOVICH, Circuit Judge.
Andre Davis was arrested in Kansas during a traffic stop after a search of his rental car revealed a bag containing cocaine. Prior to trial, the government gave notice pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 851 it intended to use two prior convictions to enhance Davis’s sentence upon conviction. One conviction did not qualify for sentencing enhancement because it occurred in Indiana after Davis’s arrest in Kansas, but the other, although it listed the wrong case number, was used to enhance Davis’s sentence to a mandatory minimum of 240 months’ imprisonment. At trial, pursuant to…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- United States v. ArvizuSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Oyler v. BolesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Illinois v. CaballesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- United States v. LaBonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Hamal, Angela DoddCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2012
- United States v. KitchellCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. PettitCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Gregory SanfordCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. BrooksCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.