Legal Opinion
Berlin v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided August 26, 1926No. 3390PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIS, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff in error, hereinafter called defendant, was indicted, tried, and convicted for having used the United States mails to execute a scheme and artifice to defraud which he had devised in violation of section 215 of the federal Criminal Code (Comp. St. § 10385). He moved for the direction of a verdict at the conclusion of both the government’s case and his case, but the motions were denied, and the denial of these motions is the ground on which he bases his right to a reversal. He contends that the government did not produce evidence sufficient to sustain the…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Hopt v. People of Territory of UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Pennsylvania Co. v. RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Goldsby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Michigan Insurance Bank v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Albert J. Doherty v. American Motors Corporation, a Foreign CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Joseph D. Nunan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Kilpatrick v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
- Twin Ports Oil Co. v. Pure Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1939
- C. M. Mickler and Ethel G. Mickler v. John L. Fahs, Former Collector of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1957
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.