Twin Ports Oil Co. v. Pure Oil Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.:
Plaintiff, a jobber in-gasoline and allied products, alleges a conspiracy among and by the above-named defendant oil companies to raise prices and to make uniform certain so-called jobbers’ contracts, so as to prevent plaintiff in the event its dealings were not satisfactory with one of the major oil companies, .from entering into a contract with any other one of the so-called majors. In proving the conspiracy alleged, plaintiff seeks to rely, on the method of proof provided by the Clayton Amendment to ..the- Sherman AntiTrust Act.
The complaint alleges the rendering…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Humphrey's v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Gray v. GrunnagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
- Tseung Chu v. CornellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- Kilpatrick v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
- Sun-Times Media Group, Inc. v. BlackCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
- International Shoe MacHine Corporation v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.