Legal Opinion

Twin Ports Oil Co. v. Pure Oil Co.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided January 25, 1939No. 4000PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORDBYE, District Judge.:

Plaintiff, a jobber in-gasoline and allied products, alleges a conspiracy among and by the above-named defendant oil companies to raise prices and to make uniform certain so-called jobbers’ contracts, so as to prevent plaintiff in the event its dealings were not satisfactory with one of the major oil companies, .from entering into a contract with any other one of the so-called majors. In proving the conspiracy alleged, plaintiff seeks to rely, on the method of proof provided by the Clayton Amendment to ..the- Sherman AntiTrust Act.

The complaint alleges the rendering…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Berman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Humphrey's v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. United States v. Missouri Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  4. Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. Hudson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1926

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Gray v. GrunnagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Tseung Chu v. CornellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  3. Kilpatrick v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  4. Sun-Times Media Group, Inc. v. BlackCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 2008
  5. International Shoe MacHine Corporation v. United Shoe MacHinery CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1963

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API