Legal Opinion
United States v. City of New York
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided May 12, 2000No. 97 CV 2154 NG SMG, 99 CV 6224 NG SMG, 99 CV 7399 NG SMGPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
GERSHON, District Judge.
On November 24, 1998, I approved a Consent Decree resolving claims brought by the United States, acting on behalf of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), and the State of New York against the City of New York to require the City to provide filtration and disinfection treatment for its Croton Water Supply System. United States v. City of New York, 30 F.Supp.2d 325 (E.D.N.Y.1998). The Consent Decree enforces compliance by the City with federal and state requirements that it filter and disinfect the water, requirements with which the City had…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Jackson v. New York State Urban Development Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Chemical Specialties Manufacturers Ass'n v. JorlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Williams v. . GallatinNew York Court of Appeals · 1920
- WEOK Broadcasting Corp. v. Planning BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Ellington Construction Corp. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Inc. Village of New HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Van Cortlandt Park v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- Develop Don't Destroy Brooklyn v. Empire State Development Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Friends Of Van Cortlandt Park v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- Schonfeld v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
- Friends of Van Cortlandt Park v. City of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.