Legal Opinion
Schonfeld v. City of New York
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 25, 2001No. Docket No. 00-7387PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SUMMARY ORDER
UPON DUE CONSIDERATION, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that the judgment be AFFIRMED.
*130Frank Schonfeld, pro se, appeals from the order entered in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Gershon, J.) denying his motion to intervene in two related district court actions: Friends of Van Cortlandt Park v. City of New York, 96 F.Supp.2d 195 (E.D.N.Y.), and Norwood Community Action v. Dep’t of Environmental Protection, 96 F.Supp.2d 195 (E.D.N.Y.). See Friends of Van Cortlandt Park v. City of New York, No. 99-cv-7399 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 23, 2000)…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. Pitney Bowes, Inc., Edo Corporation Plessey, Inc. Vernitron Corp., Baii Banking Corp., Movant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
- Van Cortlandt Park v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2001
- United States v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
- United States v. City of New YorkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2000
- Friends Of Van Cortlandt Park v. City Of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
3Cited by2 opinions
- Abondolo v. GGR Holbrook Medford, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2002
- High Farms, LLC v. KingDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2021