Legal Opinion

Mayhall & Neible v. Chicago, Burlinton & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 17, 1921No. 21620PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court for Douglas county: Arthur O. Wakeley, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtLetton, J.

This action is brought to recover damages for failure to deliver certain cattle. • The petition alleges that on the 13th day of January, 1919, plaintiff delivered to the defendant, the Union Stock Yards Company, at South Omaha, about 35 head of cattle for transportation to Edinburg, Indiana, to be delivered there to plaintiff; that it took possession of cattle and undertook to deliver them to the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Company; that it delivered a car into which the cattle had been loaded to said last-named defendant, and plaintiff paid the last-named defendant the charges for…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bensieck v. CookSupreme Court of Missouri · 1892
  2. Roose v. PerkinsNebraska Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Dunn v. Hannibal & St. Joseph RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1878
  4. State ex rel. Winnett v. Union Stock Yards Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Wunderlich v. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1896

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daily v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1923
  2. McGinley v. Union Pacific RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Young v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API