Legal Opinion

Young v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1923No. 22363Published

1Opinion of the CourtRose, J.

This is an action to recover damages for alleged negligence in the starting of fires and in the failure to properly fence defendant’s railroad right of way. Injury to grass and land, destruction of farm property, killing of hogs on the railroad track, and labor in fighting fire are pleaded in the petition as damages aggregating $1,523.01. Defendant denied the negligence charged and liability for damages. Upon a trial of the issues the jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $1,464.79. From a judgment thereon defendant has appealed.

By motion plaintiff directs attention to the fact…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Mayhall & Neible v. Chicago, Burlinton & Quincy RailroadNebraska Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API