Legal Opinion

McGinley v. Union Pacific Railroad

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1935No. 29365PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEberly, J.

This is an action by plaintiffs, George McGinley & Sons, copartners, against the Union Pacific Railroad Company and the Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company, for damages occasioned by unnecessary delay, due to the negligence of the defendants, who are connecting carriers, in the transportation of 98 head of fat cattle from Brule, Nebraska, to the Union Stock Yards at Chicago, Illinois. These defendants will hereinafter be referred to. as the “Union Pacific” and the “Milwaukee,” respectively.

A trial to a jury, after issues were joined, resulted in a verdict for plaintiffs,…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Riverside MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Cincinnati, New Orleans & Texas Pacific Railway Co. v. RankinSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. CadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  4. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. WallSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  5. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. NYE Schneider Fowler Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fairmont Creamery Co. v. ThompsonNebraska Supreme Court · 1941
  2. BURKE LUMBER & COAL COMPANY v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API