Legal Opinion

State v. Eyman

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 4, 1992No. WD 43585PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ULRICH, Judge.

Paul Eyman appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine, § 195.020.1, RSMo 1986 (repealed). He was charged by indictment, convicted in a court-tried case,1 and sentenced to three years incarceration in the custody of the Missouri Department of Corrections. Mr. Eyman contends that the trial court erred in (1) overruling his motion to suppress his grand jury testimony and permitting introduction of the testimony at trial and (2) in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal because, he claims, the evidence was insufficient to establish that he possessed cocaine. The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. Procter & Gamble Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Bullington v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Herbert v. HarlSupreme Court of Missouri · 1988
  5. State v. SalmonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Interest of T.L.C. v. T.L.C.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. State v. BeckettMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. State v. FearsMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Orr v. CalicottCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2009
  5. State v. SuttonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API