State v. Sutton

PUDLOWSKI, Judge.

Defendant appeals from his conviction for murdering his wife. He expressly waives any objections to the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion. We affirm.

Defendant claims that the trial court erred in overruling his motions for acquittal because the only eyewitness to the crime, the eleven year old son of the victim, was so inconsistent and contradictory as to lose all probative value. We disagree.

In the usual case, we view all evidence and all reasonable inferences therefrom in the light most favorable to the verdict. State v. Bernard, 849 S.W.2d 10, 21 (Mo. bane 1993). However,…