Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Olmstead

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 10, 2012No. SCBD No. 5843PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCombs, J.

1 The issues in this original proceeding for attorney discipline are: (1) whether the record before this Court is sufficient for review of the charges against the respondent and for disposition, and (2) what is the appropriate discipline. We find the record is sufficient for a meaningful review and the appropriate discipline is suspension from practice of law for one year.

I. BACKGROUND

12 This disciplinary proceeding is before this Court pursuant to Rule 7 of the Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings (RGDP), 5 0.8. 2001, ch. 1, app. 1-A. Rule 7 provides for summary disciplinary proceedings…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. RaskinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. EakinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. DorisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1999
  4. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. WilburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2006
  5. State Ex Rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. EZELLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020
  2. STATE ex rel. OKLAHOMA BAR ASSOCIATION v. EZELLSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API