Walsky Construction Co. v. Sea-Land Services, Inc.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MATTHEWS, Justice.
The major question presented by this appeal is whether a common carrier regulated under the Interstate Commerce Act may be liable to a shipper for misrepresentation of its freight rates. We hold, in accordance with controlling federal precedent, that the common carrier is exempt from such liability.
I
Taking, as we must, where summary judgment is granted, the facts most favorable to the losing party,1 the following situation is presented. Sea-Land Services, Inc., a common carrier, solicited Walsky Construction Co. for its shipping business and quoted a certain freight…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. Western Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MaxwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Elmore & StahlSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. FinkSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Central Iron & Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kos v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
- Sallee Horse Vans, Inc. v. PessinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988