State v. Leggett
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Cueiam.
Defendant offered evidence. Hence, as to defendant’s motion for judgment as in case of nonsuit, the only question is whether the court erred in the denial of the motion made by defendant at the close of all the evidence. G.S. 15-173.
The elements of the crime defined in G.S. 14-180 and the evidence required to support a conviction therefor are fully stated in S. v. Smith, 223 N.C. 199, 25 S.E. 2d 619, and cases cited. Here, the prosecutrix testified as to each essential element; and, as to each essential element, there was independent supporting evidence. Hence, defendant’s said…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. RobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- State v. MeadowsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- State v. StinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- State v. ColsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
- State v. HowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.