Hudick v. Hastings Mutual Insurance
Michigan Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtMarkey, J.
Defendant appeals by right the trial court’s orders granting plaintiff’s motion for summary disposition, pursuant to MCR 2.116(C)(9) and (C)(10), and denying defendant’s motions for summary disposition and reconsideration. We affirm.
On February 19, 1997, plaintiff was severely injured when his two-wheel vehicle collided with a van. Because plaintiff lived with his parents, their no-fault insurer, Allstate Insurance Company, began paying plaintiff’s personal protection insurance (pip) benefits on a coordinated basis. Defendant, which insured the van under a policy that did not coordinate…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
- Lewis v. Detroit Automobile Inter-Insurance ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
- Welton v. Carriers InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1985
- Johnson v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
- Titan Ins. Co. v. FARMERS INS.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2000
3Cited by11 opinions
- Young v. SellersMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
- Allstate Insurance Co v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CoMichigan Court of Appeals · 2017
- Buntea v. State Farm Mutual Auto InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
- Bliss Clearing Niagara, Inc. v. Midwest Brake Bond Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2004
- Poly-Flex Construction, Inc. v. Neyer, Tiseo & Hindo, Ltd.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.