Legal Opinion

Thomas v. Doe

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 8, 2020No. 3:20-cv-00445Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KEITH THOMAS, Case No.: 20cv0445 BAS (JLB) 12 Petitioner, ORDER: (1) GRANTING MOTION 13 v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS; and (2) DISMISSING 14 MARCUS POLLARD, Warden, CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND 15 Respondent. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 16 17 I. INTRODUCTION 18 On January 27, 2020, Petitioner Keith Thomas filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas 19 Corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (ECF No. 1.) The Court dismissed the action without 20 prejudice and with leave to amend on March 13, 2020 because Petitioner sought to 21…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Duncan v. HenrySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. Artuz v. BennettSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Granberry v. GreerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Guenter Mannhalt v. Amos E. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
  5. Mike Hernandez v. Eddie S. Ylst, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API