Legal Opinion
United States v. One 1940 Packard Coupe
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 7, 1941No. 6302PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McLELLAN, District Judge.
I have no reason to suppose that I shall be able better to decide this controversy by taking it under advisement instead of deciding it now at the conclusion of the trial, while the evidence and the views of counsel as to the applicable law are fresh in my memory.
This is a libel by the United States of America for the forfeiture of a Packard coupe, wherein Concetta Santaniello, the registered owner thereof, and Seaboard Commercial Corporation are claimants. Pertinent to a decision of the controversy is the construction of an Act of Congress of August 9, 1939,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- J. W. Goldsmith, Jr.-Grant Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- United States v. One Ford Coupe AutomobileSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Various Items of Personal Property v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- United States v. One Black HorseDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1904
- United States v. One Reo Speed WagonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1925
3Cited by11 opinions
- Prince George's County v. Blue Bird Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- United States v. AndradeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. Audrey Bride, , United States of America v. Madeline DefalcoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Cadillac Automobile Co. of Boston v. EngeianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1959
- United States v. One 1976 Lincoln Mark IV, Serial 6Y89A876578 Michigan License TWP 951District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.