Legal Opinion

Karren v. Bair

Utah Supreme Court

Decided April 16, 1924No. 3992PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFrick, J.

• The plaintiff recovered judgment against the defendant H. E. Bair, hereinafter called appellant, in the district court of Cache county. The complaint is in the usual form in actions upon promissory notes by an indorsee against a maker and indorser.

The defendant, in his answer, after denying the allegations of the complaint, set up several affirmative defenses. For the *346reasons hereinafter appearing, it is not necessary to refer to the defenses in detail. It is sufficient to state that in the answer, among other defenses, the plaintiff’s right to recover upon the note is assailed upon the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNight v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  2. Leavitt v. ThurstonUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Marling v. FitzGeraldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Capitol Hill State Bank v. Rawlins National BankWyoming Supreme Court · 1916
  5. United States National Bank v. FlossOregon Supreme Court · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re Richard's EstateUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Cottrell v. Grand Union Tea CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1956
  3. First Trust & Savings Bank v. RandallIdaho Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Christensen v. Financial Service Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1963
  5. National Bank of the Republic v. BecksteadUtah Supreme Court · 1926

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API