Legal Opinion
Albert Trostel & Sons Co. v. Notz
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Decided February 28, 2008No. 07-C-0763PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO STRIKE INSUFFICIENT DEFENSES AND DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS
C.N. CLEVERT, JR., District Judge.
Albert Trostel & Sons Company (ATS) filed a complaint with this court on August 23, 2007, seeking a determination of the fair value of the defendants’ shares of stock, pursuant to the Dissenter’s Rights provision of the Wisconsin Business Corporation Law, Wisconsin Statutes § 180.1330. On September 13, 2007, the defendants filed an Answer and Affirmative Defenses, which included an assertion that this court lacks subject matter juris diction…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Hibbing Taconite Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
- Notz v. Everett Smith Group, Ltd.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2009
- Sound Infiniti, Inc. v. SnyderCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Albert Trostel & Sons Co. v. NotzCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
- NEXT Millennium Telecom Co v. American Signal CorporationDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2022
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.