Legal Opinion

State v. Nickerson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1883PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Dickinson District Court. At the May Term, 1883, Nickerson was convicted of a. violation of the prohibitory law, and adjudged to pay a fine of $125, together with the costs of the prosecution, taxed at $419.40, and to be committed to the jail of Dickinson county until the fine and costs were paid. He appeals. The opinion-states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Brewer, J.:

Defendant was convicted in the district court of Dickinson county of a violation of the prohibitory law,- and from such conviction prosecutes his appeal to this court. A preliminary question-is raised by the state. It insists that as no transcript of the record is filed here, there is nothing-for us to examine, and act upon. The original bill of exceptions is filed, and upon that the errors are predicated. This is insufficient.' A bill of exceptions has no place outside of the court in which it is prepared. Its function is to bring upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shumaker v. O'BrienSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  2. Lauer v. LivingsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1880
  3. State v. LundSupreme Court of Kansas · 1882

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Etenburn v. NearySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
  2. State ex rel. Jackson v. Topeka ClubSupreme Court of Kansas · 1910
  3. State v. HoracekSupreme Court of Kansas · 1889
  4. State v. LarkinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  5. City of Junction v. WebbSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API