Verdi v. United States
District Court, E.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
BARTELS, District Judge.
The question presented is whether the doctrine of pendent jurisdiction can be applied in a Federal Torts Claims Act (FTCA) case to a state common law case arising out of a common nucleus of operative fact even though there is otherwise no federal jurisdiction over the party against whom the state common law claim is asserted.
Plaintiffs brought this action, arising out of a slip and fall on a sidewalk abutting a United States Post Office in Huntington, under the Federal Torts Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 2671 et seq., and the corresponding jurisdictional provision of 28…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Aldinger v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,755, Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,074 William B. Weinberger v. James C. Kendrick, Charles M. CoyneCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- Myers & Myers, Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- 55 Motor Avenue Co. v. Liberty Industrial Finishing Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Finley v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989