Legal Opinion

Shaw v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 12, 1932No. Appeal, 203PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

Appellant gave its bond to secure the .payment of rent. It contained the following condition: “That upon the obligee’s becoming aware of any default in any of the covenants and conditions of the lease, either in the payments or the performance by the said Halle......the said obligee shall give immediate notice thereof in writing to the surety......and if said notice is not given within thirty days after the discovery of such breach ......then this bond shall be void.” The difference between the parties is over the word “default” in the bond. Appellant urges that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Young v. American Bonding Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1910
  2. Purdy v. MasseySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. South Phila. State Bank v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. Lackland v. EdwinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Fidelity Fund, Inc. v. Di SantoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Kalina v. EckertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Koss v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1989
  4. Gentile v. American State Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  5. Philadelphia v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API