Legal Opinion
DirecTV, Inc. v. Kaas
District Court, N.D. Iowa
Decided December 17, 2003No. C03-4047-PAZPublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT AGAINST DEFENDANT TIM WEBER
ZOSS, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of the plaintiff DIRECTV, Inc. (“DIRECTV”) for default judgment against the defendant Tim Weber (“Weber”). DIRECTV commenced this action on May 21, 2003, by the filing of a Complaint in which DIRECTV alleges, inter alia, the following facts:
1. Plaintiff DIRECTV is the nation’s leading direct broadcast satellite system, delivering over 225 channels of television and other programming to more than 10 million homes…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Pamela A. Dorris v. Charles Absher and Della AbsherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Taylor v. City of Ballwin, MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1988
- Hayek v. Big Brothers/Big Sisters of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
- Reynolds v. SpearsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- DirecTV, Inc. v. HuynhDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2004
- Blanchard v. DirecTV, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- DirecTV, Inc. v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- DirecTV, Inc. v. NeznakDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2005
- Directv, Inc. v. AgeeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.