Legal Opinion

DirecTV, Inc. v. Huynh

District Court, M.D. Alabama

Decided May 19, 2004No. Civil Action 1:03cv0826-TPublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MYRON H. THOMPSON, District Judge.

Plaintiff DIRECTV, Inc. brought this action against defendant James Huynh alleging violations of the Federal Communication Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.A. § 605(a), the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968, as amended by the Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986, 18 U.S.C.A. §§ 2511(l)(a) & 2512(l)(b), and state law. The claims in this case arise from Huynh’s alleged use of devices to receive DIRECTV’S satellite television service without paying for it. The court’s jurisdiction has been properly invoked. 47 U.S.C.A. §…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
  2. Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  3. Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  4. Pope v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  5. Goforth v. OwensCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. DIRECTV, Inc. v. RobsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  2. Frazier v. Absolute Collection Service, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2011
  3. DirecTV, Inc. v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
  4. Alfa Corp. v. Alfa Mortgage Inc.District Court, M.D. Alabama · 2008
  5. Chanel, Inc. v. ReplicachanelbagDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2019

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API