Legal Opinion
DirecTV, Inc. v. Neznak
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 10, 2005No. 303CV918JBAPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT [Doc. # 14]
ARTERTON, District Judge.
Following entry of default on October 19, 2004, plaintiff DIRECTV, Inc. has moved for default judgment, seeking $50,000 in statutory damages, injunctive relief, and attorneys fees and costs. There have been no appearances or motions to set aside filed by or on behalf of defendant. For the reasons discussed below, plaintiffs motion [Doc. # 14] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.
I. Background
Plaintiff DIRECTV, Inc. is a direct broadcast satellite system delivering television and other programming to homes and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vermont Teddy Bear Company, Inc. v. 1-800 Beargram CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Pamela A. Dorris v. Charles Absher and Della AbsherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- DirecTV, Inc. v. KaasDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2003
3Cited by12 opinions
- DirecTV, Inc. v. Hoa HuynhCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- DIRECTV, Inc. v. RobsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
- Gunawan v. Sake Sushi RestaurantDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2012
- DirecTV, Inc. v. RawlinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2008
- Century 21 Real Estate LLC v. Bercosa Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2009
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.