Legal Opinion

Mathy v. Mathy

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 9, 1940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

As appears from the foregoing statement of facts the action was brought to quiet title. The parties claim through a warranty deed of a common grantor. The introductory clause of this deed recites that the deed was made between “Toussaint Mathy and Mary Mathy, his wife, during her lifetime and after her death to the children of said Toussaint Mathy, parties of the second part.”

It is contended by the plaintiffs that the granting clause of the original deed controls the introductory clause, and as the granting clause does not purport to convey a life estate but a fee it therefore must be taken…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Weber v. NedinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Fries v. KracklauerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Snadon v. GayerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
  2. Gagnon v. PronovostSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
  3. Joseph Mann Library Ass'n v. City of Two RiversWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Thompson v. ThompsonMichigan Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Heinemann v. RosierWisconsin Supreme Court · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API