Legal Opinion

Fries v. Kracklauer

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1929PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEschweiler, J.

The plaintiffs below, respondents here, claiming only through Elizabeth Fries, one of the grantees of the deed set forth above, contended below, and again here, that the deed was to the grantees as tenants in common and that the word “jointly” appearing in the first paragraph is and was of no importance, or, in any event, that under the testimony that was received of the scrivener who *550drew the conveyance and of others as to statements made to them by the grantor, the fact was that she intended to convey to the two daughters as tenants in common and not as joint tenants.

The appellant contends…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Overheiser v. . LackeyNew York Court of Appeals · 1913
  2. Dickson v. Van HooseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1908
  3. Case v. OwenIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Mustain v. GardnerIllinois Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Breitenbach v. SchoenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Weber v. NedinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Taylor v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Hass v. HassWisconsin Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Estate of KwatkowskiSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934
  5. Mathy v. MathyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API