Legal Opinion

Heinemann v. Rosier

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The following opinion was filed January 13, 1942:

Fowler, J.

The case is an appeal from a judgment of the county court of Outagamie county, in probate. The judgment is incorporated in the concluding sentence of an eight-page typewritten document signed by the trial judge headed “Decision.” There are no1 “Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law,” although interspersed in the document with statements of contentions of the parties, statements of testimony, and statements by the trial judge by way of argument, certain statements may be found that may by inference be taken as conclusions of ultimate…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Peter v. PeterIllinois Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Wisconsin Marine & Fire Insurance Co. Bank v. MannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Rowell v. BarberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Estate of SipchenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Jenkins v. BradleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Putnam v. Time Warner Cable of Southeastern Wisconsin, Ltd. PartnershipWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Estate of RileyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Peterson v. Crown Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1979
  4. Hall v. WaltonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Putnam v. Time Warner Cable of Southeastern Wisconsin, Ltd. PartnershipWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API